[Management] Proposed change to msub requirements

[Seth Theriault]

Michael Osterman wrote:

> I think Peter's spot on here--the commiter + institution (or 
> employer if commercial partners get brought into the mix) 
> should submit the appropriate paperwork so that the 
> contributions really belong to Sakai. That in itself slows the 
> process down and would be enough of a deterrent to prevent 
> casual (ab)use.

I don't think the intent was to make sure work being done in the 
mSub branches was "owned" by the Foundation but rather that the 
main SVN repo -- of which mSub is a part -- not have any 
exceptions to the CCLA/CLA rules.

Obviously, having these rules in place eases the pain of applying 
any patches/fixes/features that come out of mSub work to the main 
work.

Seth