[infrastructure] Concerns about security
May, Megan Marie
mmmay at indiana.edu
Tue Dec 6 11:25:50 PST 2011
Confluence is locked down where these are stored.
That said, this deals with the Foundations IP which IMHO, is something the foundation should be handling.
From: infrastructure-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:infrastructure-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Holladay
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 2:24 PM
To: Maurer, Christopher Wayne
Cc: infrastructure at collab.sakaiproject.org
Subject: Re: [infrastructure] Concerns about security
Was the fax approach secure enough? Any volunteers for updating the fax number to one where someone is on the other side?
That would bring us back to the old approach, but if that includes attaching the CLA's to confluence still, then that's another problem
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Maurer, Christopher Wayne <chmaurer at iupui.edu> wrote:
> Just an FYI, I've had a number of folks express concerns about storing
> their signed CLA docs in Jira tickets (as well as sending them to us via email).
> I'm not sure if they have the same concern about storing them in
> confluence, but perhaps they don't even know about that part. Do we
> have a reasonable comfort level with the level of security surrounding
> the jira/confluence portion of this process? On one hand, it's just
> names and signatures, but we should still ensure that we are
> protecting them appropriately. Thoughts?
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at collab.sakaiproject.org
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure at collab.sakaiproject.org
More information about the infrastructure